The basic purpose of narrative is to
entertain, to gain and hold a readers' interest. However narratives can
also be written to teach or inform, to change attitudes / social
opinions eg soap operas and television dramas that are used to raise
topical issues. Narratives sequence people/characters in time and place
but differ from recounts in that through the sequencing, the stories set
up one or more problems, which must eventually find a way to be
resolved.
There are many types of
narrative. They can be imaginary, factual or a combination of both. They
may include fairy stories, mysteries, science fiction, romances, horror
stories, adventure stories, fables, myths and legends, historical
narratives, ballads, slice of life, personal experience.
(introduction) in which the characters, setting and time of the story
are established. Usually answers who? when? where? eg. Mr Wolf went out
hunting in the forest one dark gloomy night.
The complication usually involves the main character(s) (often mirroring the complications in real life).
There needs to be a resolution of the complication. The complication
may be resolved for better or worse/happily or unhappily. Sometimes
there are a number of complications that have to be resolved. These add
and sustain interest and suspense for the reader.
WRITING
COMMENTS - GENERAL REMARKS (1)
Comments
are argumentative texts. In other words, you want your reader to understand and
agree with your point of view and the reasons you give for having it. The
answers to the following questions should help you to achieve this.
1.
Who
is going to read your answer? (The answer you write for a twelve-year-old child
will probably be different from one you write for a teacher!)
2.
How
much background information do you think the reader has?
3.
How
much will you have to give him / her?
4.
What
do you want the reader's reaction to be after reading the text? (Should the
reader DO something, accept or
reject something, change his mind about something?)
5.
Can
you summarise the main point of your argument in one sentence? (It is important
that you do this in order to make sure you are keeping to the point.)
6.
What
evidence do you give to support your argument? (This can taken from your own
experience, books you have read, texts you have studied, programmes you have
seen or heard.)
7.
Have
you presented the evidence effectively? (This can be done by using different
methods such as definitions, examples, comparisons, contrasts, etc.)
8.
What
are the opposing views to yours? Have you dealt with them and shown why you
think they are wrong?
9.
How
do you want to structure your answer? (How do you want to introduce the topic?
How many paragraphs should there be in the main part of the answer? What do you
want to put into your last paragraph?
GIVING
PERSONAL COMMENTS (2)
In a personal comment, we usually state first whether we are for or
against something. Then we give reasons and arguments for what we think,
usually in contrast to a different view. Normally we finish with a conclusion
based on the evidence that we have given. When we develop a comment by moving
from reasons FOR a view to reasons AGAINST it, then to other reasons for and
against it and so on, we follow a DIALECTICAL ORDER. This dialectical order is
based on contrasts and comparisons.
STEPS FOR WRITING A COMMENT
1.
Think of the given fact or idea with which opposing
ideas are or can be connected. Use this fact / idea as the topic to start from.
2.
Quote or sum up the viewpoint you wish to OPPOSE.
Inform your readers / listeners about the standpoint (thesis) you do not
accept.
3.
Then state your own view, the antithesis, which you
can support and defend. Do this with AT LEAST two pieces of evidence.
Your own view may be introduced by
- a contrastive
signal (e.g. "However", "Yet", "On the other
hand", ... etc.)
-
a viewpoint expression (e.g. "I think / do not
think", "In my view" - cf. the relevant handouts).
4.
Attitudinal adverbs (e.g. "obviously",
"clearly", "certainly,".... etc.) can provide EMPHASIS but
care is needed when using them because they are sometimes used to appeal only
to the reader's / listener's emotions and not to his / her intellect.
5.
Support what you think with evidence from everyday
experience, your personal experience, from the text you are dealing with, or
from other texts, books, and magazines you have read previously. In a personal
comment you may also appeal to people's needs and values.
6.
In your argumentation, you may also wish to use the
following kinds of clauses which are frequently found in comments;
- clauses of reason
/ cause with "since", "as", "because", ... etc.
- clauses of
concession to include counter arguments. These are introduced by words like
"although", "whereas", ... etc.
- conditional
clauses with "if", "unless", ... etc. in order to say
¨ what is possible
in the present or in the future;
e.g. If X happens / happened ... Y will / would result.
¨
say what you think was possible only in the past but
is no longer possible in the present:
e.g. If X had happened ... Y would / would not have resulted.
7.
To introduce arguments for or against a viewpoint,
you can also use CAUSAL EXPRESSIONS at the beginning of a sentence;
e.g. "The reasons for this are...."; "This is why ...";
"Another reason for this is ...".
8.
Contrastive signals can be used in the body of your
text to continue and support the dialectical order of contrast and comparison
in the text (cf. no. 3 above).
9.
At the end of a paragraph or longer comment, draw a
conclusion from your arguments by using signals like "so",
"thus", "therefore", ... etc.
EXAMPLE QUESTION AND
ANSWER
“Do you agree that TV
has lead to the death of books?”
The word
“death” in the question is, in itself, provocative, suggesting an extreme point
of view. Evidently / Certainly / Apparently the amount of TV viewing has
increased rapidly in the last ten years, as evidenced by / as shown in / as
suggested by / as documented in the report /the book / the text by ....
This
would not seem / does not seem (to me) to indicate .... On the contrary, recent
research in this field suggests that ....
The next
point to consider / the question then arises as to / how much time is given
over to reading and what kinds of books are read by whom. When we consider that
the amount of information available doubles every seven years, we must consider
it the duty of members of the professions to read as much as possible.
Evidence
in the USA / UK / Germany seems to indicate / suggest / point to an increase in
the number of hours spent in front of the TV screen.
The
result of this is that / Consequently people have less time for reading
To
return to the question, the answer seems to be ....
Perhaps
we should also reconsider how books are written in view of the limited reading
time available. 'Books' here includes those written to entertain as well as
those providing information. …
Thus,
after a careful consideration of the arguments, I am lead to the conclusion
that …
ARGUMENTATIVE
TEXTS
(evaluation and judgement in response
to a problem)
An argumentative text
a) tries to persuade/convince the
reader/listener
b) is based on subjective evaluation of a
problem
FEATURES
1. Two main types:-
Comment - subjective argumentation
Scientific argumentation - from an
objective point of view
2. Types of connectives frequently found:
reason/cause; contrast; purpose;
result; exclusion;
3. Styles involved:
informal; ironic; appreciatory/depreciatory, persuasive
informal style:
-
1st/2nd
person point- of view (“I” / “you”);
-
simple
short sentences and words;
-
Only
essential punctuation.
-
The
speaker/ writer is socially at ease with the addressees.
ironic style:
-
speaker/writer
feels disrespect or contempt;
-
linguistic
exaggeration;
-
speaker/writer
says the opposite of what he means.
-
A: I
fine students who make mistakes.
-
B:
That sounds like a fine educational idea!
-
The
user often employs this style to persuade quickly instead of employing reasoned
arguments.
appreciatory style:
-
The writer
wants to influence the addressee in favour of what he refers to in the text;
e.g. “Come to Germany and enjoy the quality and high standards we’re world
famous for.”;
-
this
style frequently employs emotive words and euphemisms (“He passed away” instead
of “he died”);
-
it
avoids negative sentences;
-
it
uses words with positive connotations. Something is presented as being better
than it really is (e.g. advertising)
-
The
opposite is “depreciatory style” (unpleasant connotations, negative not
affirmative sentences Something can be presented as being worse than it really
is.
persuasive style
-
seeks
to get addressee’s spontaneous consent. (“It is, of course, obvious that...”);
makes use of attitudinal adverbs (“surely”, “obviously”, etc.;),
-
intensifying
adverbs (clearly/terribly/ absolutely),
-
rhetorical
questions and parentheses (“The search for happiness - as we know front our own
experience - is a long one”.)